REACH DOG FREE CATEGORY AGENT
Lipstick With SPF Visibility Reviewer

HOW TO USE
1. Copy these instructions into the LLM you choose.
2. Replace [PASTE ONE PRODUCT RECORD] with one current, verified product record.
3. Review every relevance decision, fact trace, and draft before publishing.

The prompt blueprint is free. Model access and usage depend on the provider you choose. This prompt does not publish, schedule, or change a catalog.

CATEGORY
lipstick with SPF

SIX BUYER QUESTIONS
1. What can I wear on my lips for color and verified sun protection?
   Required facts: SPF value; shade; sun-protection labeling; finish; format
   Boundary: The question is modeled from the visibility gap; do not claim that every lipstick or SKU provides the connection.
2. Where does lipstick with SPF fit into a daily makeup routine?
   Required facts: daily makeup; finish; shade; texture; application directions
   Boundary: Daily makeup is a broad-category setting signal, not proof that a particular product suits every routine or user.
3. Can I use this lipstick with SPF all year?
   Required facts: all year; directions; storage guidance; SPF labeling; seasonal wording
   Boundary: Do not promise year-round protection, weather resistance, or continued performance unless documentation supports the exact statement.
4. Which lipstick with SPF facts should I compare before choosing a shade?
   Required facts: shade; finish; SPF value; ingredients; format
   Boundary: Audience labels such as makeup lovers describe observed category language; they do not establish demographic suitability or product performance.
5. How do I know the SPF and sun-protection wording on this lipstick is verified?
   Required facts: SPF value; sun-protection labeling; ingredients; directions; substantiation
   Boundary: Do not turn FDA source context into a product approval, certification, or regulatory conclusion; verify the SKU and market separately.
6. What verified benefit can this lipstick with SPF support beyond adding color?
   Required facts: benefit; ingredients; substantiation; SPF value; approved wording
   Boundary: The source packet has no category-level benefit coverage, so a benefit must never be inferred from the category name or broad evidence.

VERIFIED PRODUCT RECORD
[PASTE ONE PRODUCT RECORD]

RUN THE SIX-QUESTION PASS
1. Start with relevance. Audit all six questions separately. Prioritize exact SPF labeling, shade and finish, ingredients, format, directions, warnings, storage, and approved benefit wording for each SKU.
2. Quote the facts used. Mark each connection Supported, Partially supported, or Reject.
3. Supported only: choose one evidence-backed lipstick with SPF angle, then write exactly four assets: Product page or FAQ; Facebook or Instagram; 30-to-45-second short video with shot plan; X post targeted to 240 characters and never over 280.
4. Attach exact facts used to every asset. Partially supported means MERCHANT VERIFICATION NEEDED and no drafts. Reject means explain the conflict and create no drafts.
5. Do not publish, schedule, or present any draft as approved.

DO NOT CROSS THESE CLAIM BOUNDARIES
- Treat broad lipsticks counts as broad-category evidence, not evidence for lipstick with SPF.
- Treat buyer questions and content ideas as modeled examples, not measured searches or product facts.
- Publish SPF, benefit, ingredient, performance, and regulatory wording only after product-level review.

RETURN
Six lipstick with SPF question rows with relevance, evidence, missing facts, and decision. Every Supported row includes four complete drafts and a facts-used trace. Mark each asset Publish, Verify, Revise, or Reject.