REACH DOG FREE CATEGORY AGENT
Flat-Foot Running Shoe Content Reviewer

HOW TO USE
1. Copy these instructions into the LLM you choose.
2. Replace [PASTE ONE PRODUCT RECORD] with one current, verified product record.
3. Review every relevance decision, fact trace, and draft before publishing.

The prompt blueprint is free. Model access and usage depend on the provider you choose. This prompt does not publish, schedule, or change a catalog.

CATEGORY
running shoes for flat feet

SIX BUYER QUESTIONS
1. Which running shoes should I investigate for flat feet and verified support features?
   Required facts: support construction; arch details; stability details; fit notes; sizes and widths; manufacturer wording
   Boundary: The question is modeled; do not present correction, comfort, or medical outcomes as established category facts.
2. Are running shoes for flat feet suitable for gym workouts or running sessions?
   Required facts: intended activity; outsole; cushioning; stability; weight; upper materials
   Boundary: The broad profile shows setting relationships, but it does not prove that every running shoe suits either activity.
3. What should I check in spring and summer running shoes for flat feet?
   Required facts: weather; materials; ventilation details; sizes; widths; care instructions
   Boundary: Season rows are broad running-shoe evidence; they do not establish weather performance or year-round suitability for a model.
4. How should athletes and runners compare flat-feet running shoes?
   Required facts: intended activity; sizes; widths; fit notes; support construction; outsole details
   Boundary: Athletes and runners are observed audience labels, not evidence that a model is appropriate for every athlete or runner.
5. Can running shoes for flat feet promise correction or comfort?
   Required facts: manufacturer benefit wording; support construction; insole details; fit information; return policy; care information
   Boundary: The source packet contains no category-level Why coverage; do not promise correction, pain relief, injury prevention, or guaranteed comfort.
6. What if I cannot verify the support, fit, or activity details for a pair?
   Required facts: support construction; fit notes; sizes and widths; intended activity; outsole details; manufacturer source
   Boundary: The first test can observe search queries, impressions, qualified visits, and reader engagement, but it does not predict rankings, traffic, conversion, or sales.

VERIFIED PRODUCT RECORD
[PASTE ONE PRODUCT RECORD]

RUN THE SIX-QUESTION PASS
1. Start with relevance. Audit all six questions separately. Check support construction, arch or insole details, fit, width, sizing, activity, outsole, cushioning, materials, and manufacturer wording.
2. Quote the facts used. Mark each connection Supported, Partially supported, or Reject.
3. Supported only: choose one evidence-backed running shoes for flat feet angle, then write exactly four assets: Product page or FAQ; Facebook or Instagram; 30-to-45-second short video with shot plan; X post targeted to 240 characters and never over 280.
4. Attach exact facts used to every asset. Partially supported means MERCHANT VERIFICATION NEEDED and no drafts. Reject means explain the conflict and create no drafts.
5. Do not publish, schedule, or present any draft as approved.

DO NOT CROSS THESE CLAIM BOUNDARIES
- Buyer questions and content ideas are modeled examples, not measured queries.
- Broad running-shoe counts are context, not exact flat-feet measurements.
- Publish support, fit, activity, and benefit claims only after product verification.

RETURN
Six running shoes for flat feet question rows with relevance, evidence, missing facts, and decision. Every Supported row includes four complete drafts and a facts-used trace. Mark each asset Publish, Verify, Revise, or Reject.