Case 263 - American Military Retaliation for Terrorism: Judging the Merits of the 1998 Cruise Missile Strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan

Case 263 - American Military Retaliation for Terrorism: Judging the Merits of the 1998 Cruise Missile Strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan

$4.50
{{option.name}}: {{selected_options[option.position]}}
{{value_obj.value}}

Russell, Richard L. In 1998 President Bill Clinton used military force to retaliate for terrorism against U.S. interests. His administration determined that Osama bin Laden, a Saudi exile and international terrorist who would later mastermind the 9/11 attacks, had orchestrated the near-simultaneous truck bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that August, killing 263 people, including 12 Americans. The Clinton administration argued that military retaliation against bin Laden’s organization was appropriate, both to mete out justice for the heinous acts and to deter future terrorist attacks against U.S. interests. The resulting cruise missile strikes sparked heated American and international criticism. Potential adversaries, particularly in the Middle East and Russia, opposed the unilateral act as a rash action. Many observers were skeptical of the veracity of the intelligence linking bin Laden to the targets, particularly in Sudan. Other observers claimed that President Clinto

Show More Show Less